| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 18608 | | | Printed | 395 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 718 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 17 | | |
|
Click on image for details.
|
|
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2017 | Volume
: 21
| Issue : 2 | Page : 56-76 |
Hazard identification, risk assessment, and control measures as an effective tool of occupational health assessment of hazardous process in an iron ore pelletizing industry
BK Rout1, BK Sikdar2
1 Assistant General Manager (Medical), Jindal Stainless limited, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
2 Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories (Med) and Certifying Surgeon, West Bengal, India
Correspondence Address:
B K Rout
J 508, Trident Galaxy, Kalinga Vihar Phase 3, Paikrapur, Bhubaneswar - 752 054, Khurda, Orissa
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_19_16
Background: With the growing numbers of iron ore pelletization industries in India, various impacts on environment and health in relation to the workplace will rise. Therefore, understanding the hazardous process is crucial in the development of effective control measures. Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control measures (HIRAC) acts as an effective tool of Occupational Health Assessment. Objective: The aim of the study was to identify all the possible hazards at different workplaces of an iron ore pelletizing industry, to conduct an occupational health risk assessment, to calculate the risk rating based on the risk matrix, and to compare the risk rating before and after the control measures. Materials and Methods: The research was a cross-sectional study done from March to December 2015 in an iron ore pelletizing industry located in Odisha, India. Data from the survey were collected by inspecting the workplace, responses of employees regarding possible hazards in their workplace, reviewing department procedure manual, work instructions, standard operating procedure, previous incident reports, material safety data sheet, first aid/injury register, and health record of employees. Results: A total of 116 hazards were identified. Results of the paired-sample's t-test showed that mean risk rating differs before taking control measures (M = 9.13, SD = 5.99) and after taking control measures (M = 2.80, SD = 1.38) at the 0.0001 level of significance (t = 12.6428, df = 115, N = 116, P < 0.0001, 95% CI for mean difference 5.34 to 7.32). On an average, risk reduction was about 6.33 points lower after taking control measures. Conclusion: The hazards having high-risk rating and above were reduced to a level considered As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) when the control measures were applied, thereby reducing the occurrence of injury or disease in the workplace.
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
|
